Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, with a global score of 95.6 against 92.3. IPhone 14 Pro's design is extremely newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy Z Flip 5G. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with iOS 16.x operating system, while Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a better performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1179 x 2556.
The iPhone 14 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.