Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is slightly better than the iPhone X's 88.1 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner phone than the iPhone X, but it's also just a bit heavier. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of screen. IPhone X counts with as much memory to install applications and games as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both have equal 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger sensor.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.