Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than iPhone XR's score of 82. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the iPhone XR. The Apple iPhone XR has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better screen than iPhone XR, because it has a higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes clearer videos and photos than iPhone XR. They have a back camera with a 12 megapixels, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.