Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, having a score of 92.3 against 82.5. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little bit heavier than Google Pixel 2 XL, it's just a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3520mAh battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.