Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Google Pixel 3, getting a 92.3 score against 80. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the Google Pixel 3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G have quite similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a less MP camera and a lower video resolution, they both have the same back camera sensor size and the same aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.