Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little inferior pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser megapixels camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a same size sensor.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.