Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 4, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better count of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with lesser MP, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.