Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 5's 89 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Google Pixel 5 were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is heavier but also a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution.
The Google Pixel 5's camera is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's camera, and although the Google Pixel 5 has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit more expensive than the Google Pixel 5, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.