Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 77. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Honor 50 Pro, although it was released only 11 months before. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processor than Honor 50 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Honor 50 Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the screen in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although the Honor 50 Pro has a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676, they both have a display of the same size.
The Honor 50 Pro's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage. Honor 50 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a way better 108 MP resolution.
Honor 50 Pro has better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.