Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner device than HTC U Ultra, although it's also just a little bit heavier. HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The HTC U Ultra has a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video quality, the same resolution camera in the back and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.