Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than HTC U11, getting a general score of 92.3 against 77.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than HTC U11, although it's a bit heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a same size camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.