Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than HTC U11 EYEs, getting a 92.3 score against 76.9. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than HTC U11 EYEs. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with Android 11 OS, and HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a little larger display, a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior CPU than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with better video frame rate.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U11 EYEs has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 19% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.