Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM. The LG G7 Fit features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.