Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than LG K52's general score of 76. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG K52 were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit lighter and thinner. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better looking screen than LG K52, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a way better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much better video quality.
The LG K52 counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K52 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.