Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the LG K61, having a score of 92.3 against 77.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the LG K61, even though both were released with only 3 months difference. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster CPU than LG K61, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than LG K61, because it has a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
LG K61 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K61 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes much better videos and photos than LG K61, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.