Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the LG K62, having a 92.3 score against 78.2. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the LG K62, although they were only released with a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processor than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better display than LG K62, because it has a much higher pixels count per display inch, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little larger screen.
The LG K62 has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K62 has longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor offering a lot lower image quality and a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.