Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the LG K92, with a global score of 92.3 against 85.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG K92 were released with only 3 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little more vivid screen than LG K92, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a quite better pixels density.
LG K92 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The LG K92 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.