Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Mirror black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 603.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than LG Q70's 77.9 overall score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than LG Q70, even when both of them were released with only 3 months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better display than LG Q70, because it has a quite bigger display, a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The LG Q70 features more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
The LG Q70 has improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.