Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than LG Stylo 6's score of 76.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Stylo 6, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount in each inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a much better (4K) video definition.
LG Stylo 6 has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.