Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the LG V10, having a global score of 92.3 against 78.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little bit lighter than LG V10. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better CPU than LG V10, because it has 7 more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM. LG V10 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
LG V10 features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V10 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than LG V10, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.