Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a 92.3 score against 82.5. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is also heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a back-facing camera with way less MP and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.