Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a overall score of 92.3 against 81.3. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a battery life that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery life.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.