Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a thinner and lighter phone than the LG V60 ThinQ, even when they were released only 5 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a little better pixels density.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.