Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola Defy (2021)'s 77.2 overall score. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than the Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is way thinner and way lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way higher pixel number per screen inch, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processor than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Defy (2021) shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a much larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.