Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite's score of 87.1. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with very similar OS features. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, it's body is a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite higher pixel count per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and faster 120 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.