Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's 92.3 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has Android 11, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has as much memory to store more apps and games as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.