Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s global score of 84.7. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot older and just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge (2022), it's body is still somewhat thinner. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bit better pixel amount in each screen inch and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more money than Motorola Edge (2022), but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.