Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a score of 92.3 against 78.5. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G is extremely older and just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still just a little thinner. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little worse number of pixels per screen inch and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better video definition, a back facing camera with way more MP and a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.