Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a older and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it a little bit thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a quite larger display and a just a bit greater pixels count per display inch.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.