Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's general score of 80.9. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released 2 years before.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit less pixels per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.