Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 40's score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an a lot older and just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit lower pixels quantity per inch of screen, a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.