Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 overall score. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it's a little heavier and was released 3 years before.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixels quantity in each screen inch, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.