Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 score. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an much older cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's a little lighter and thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little inferior pixels number in each display inch, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, they have equal internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.