Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a general score of 92.3 against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much older and just a little heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a just a little better display density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo feature very similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 31 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.