Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), with a 92.3 score against 78.9. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a quite higher display density. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.