Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's global score of 87.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released 4 years before. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit worse display density, they both have a display of the same size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.