Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, having a score of 92.3 against 81.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even though they were released only 4 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments and a way more MP back camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with slightly more storage for apps and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.