Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G Power, having a global score of 92.3 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way thinner and just a little bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G Power, although both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit greater display density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Moto G Power has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Power, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.