Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s general score of 76.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Moto G Power (2021), although both of them were released only 5 months apart. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a little bigger display, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a much higher pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos, a back camera with a much better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G Power (2021) has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, else you can save some money and get the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.