Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), having a global score of 92.3 against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), although both were released with only 5 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little better amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus (2021) takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.