Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a 92.3 score against 76. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an incredibly older device than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it much thinner and a little lighter anyway. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, a smaller aperture and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.