Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G100's 88.9 overall score. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola Moto G100 were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is notably thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Moto G100 have incredibly similar processors, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G100, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G100 features a greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G100 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Motorola Moto G100 captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a lot more MP camera, a way better 5760x3240 video resolution, a larger aperture and a way larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.