Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than the Moto G200 5G, getting a score of 92.3 against 86.2. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than Moto G200 5G, it's body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G200 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.