Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Moto G31, having a 92.3 score against 77. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older and a little heavier phone than the Moto G31, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should count with very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better looking display than Moto G31, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Motorola Moto G31 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G31 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Moto G31 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.