Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Moto G41, having a 92.3 score against 79.1. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older and just a little bit heavier than the Moto G41, it's design is still thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better display than Moto G41, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bigger screen and a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
Moto G41 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G41 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
Moto G41 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G41 features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.