Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Moto G6 Plus, with a global score of 92.3 against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the Moto G6 Plus's, but it is just a little heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid display than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a bit greater display density and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and faster video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.