Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G60, with a 92.3 score against 79.5. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is lighter and way thinner than the Motorola Moto G60, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G60, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G60 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.