Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the Moto G60s's general score of 79.9. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto G60s.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit greater display pixels density.
Moto G60s captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G60s features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.