Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a 92.3 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer and thinner, but a little heavier than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a quite bigger display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little greater display pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, a lower (4K) video resolution and a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.