Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Moto G71 5G, with a overall score of 92.3 against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Moto G71 5G, but Samsung could make it thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Moto G71 5G, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit greater pixels number in each display inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto G71 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Moto G71 5G has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Moto G71 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G71 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.